Friday, February 28, 2014

Mass immigration has left Britain 'unrecognisable', says Nigel Farage - "The Ukip leader told how he went on a commuter train journey recently through south east London and did not hear anyone speaking English"

Google Images

                         Muslims celebrating diversity in 'Londonistan'

Mass immigration has left Britain 'unrecognisable', says Nigel Farage

Mass immigration has left Britain an "unrecognisable" country that many people would not want to leave to their children and grandchildren, Nigel Farage has said.
In one of his strongest attacks on immigration policy, he said the arrival of migrants has some British people feeling that parts of the country are now alien to them.
The UK Independence Party leader said parts of the country had been "taken over" by foreigners and told how he caught a recent commuter train from London to Kent and had to wait for several stops before he heard English being spoken.
Mr Farage's comments come after official figures published on Thursday showed a shock rise of more than 30 per cent or 58,000 over the past year in net migration to Britain to 212,000, mainly accounted by migrants from southern European countries.
In his keynote speech to Ukip's spring conference in Torquay on Friday, Mr Farage said: "It's ordinary folk, it's ordinary families that are paying the financial price. But what about the social price of this? . . .

US Federal Appeals Court: School Can Ban US Flag Shirts for Safety - 'The 9th Circuit upheld the rights of Mexican students celebrating a holiday of another country over U.S. student proudly supporting this country'

Google Images


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Officials at a Northern California high school acted appropriately when they ordered students wearing American flag T-shirts to turn the garments inside out during the Mexican heritage celebration Cinco de Mayo, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials' concerns of racial violence outweighed students' freedom of expression rights. Administrators feared the American-flag shirts would enflame the passions of Latino students celebrating the Mexican holiday. Live Oak High School, in the San Jose suburb of Morgan Hill, had a history of problems between white and Latino students on that day. . . .

Kevin MacDonald: Competing Nationalisms in the Ukraine - 'Ukraine is a textbook case of the costs of multiculturalism'

- - -

Google / ABC

Competing Nationalisms in the Ukraine

In “Which Way White Man?,” Tom Sunic discusses the downside of European nationalism:
The Hungarian nationalist party Jobbik has had significant success in its PR overtures in the mainstream media in Europe and it deserves to be commended. Yet, few White American nationalists can comprehend their irrational call of the soil and blood and why Hungarian nationalists are not only concerned with Gypsy crime or with their government sell-out of the national treasure to foreign sharks, but also with the fact that one third of Hungary’s historical land still belongs to neighboring Romania and Slovakia. It must be amusing to observe from the American watchtower how White nationalists in Europe endlessly quarrel about which state in their vicinity should be in charge of a small creek in Transylvania or swaths of former German lands in today’s Silesia. For Europe’s White nationalists, however, these territorial, cultural, or linguistic disputes are a matter of life and death.
The list goes on and on all over Europe. The case study is a traumatic Croatian nationalism, which expresses itself, as a rule, in rigid papist ultra-Catholicism and which establishes its negative legitimacy in the endless name-calling of Christian Orthodox Serbs. A question: Can one be a good White nationalist without excluding the Other White nationalist?
We are certainly seeing some of that now in Ukraine. Ukraine is a textbook case of the costs of multiculturalism, a story of competing nationalisms. . . .

Thursday, February 27, 2014

The final insult: Court terror for Lee Rigby's family as his Muslim killers are dragged from dock shouting 'Allahu akbar' while fighting prison guards - before judge tells them life will NOT mean life

- - -

Google Images

The final insult: Court terror for Lee Rigby's family as his Muslim killers are dragged from dock shouting 'Allahu akbar' while fighting prison guards - before judge tells them life will NOT mean life

  • Rigby family say: 'We feel satisfied that justice has been served for Lee'

  • Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale found guilty in December

  • Adebolajo, 29, gets whole-life jail term and Adebowale, 22, gets 45 years

  • Adebowale could be freed and back on streets by the time he's aged 67

  • Both restrained during violence in court as Rigby family cower in horror

  • They ran down Rigby at 40mph last May in Woolwich and butchered him 

  • Rebecca Rigby says son Jack must 'endure' images of his dead father

  • Three people arrested outside London court as far-right protesters gather

  • . . . 

         And don't forget to 'Celebrate Diversity!'

    Tuesday, February 25, 2014

    Gay Rights, Civil Rights, And How Freedom Dies - "What we are seeing in Arizona in microcosm is what we have witnessed in America for half a century: the growing intolerance of those who preach tolerance and the corruption of the concept of civil rights."

    Gay Rights, Civil Rights, And How Freedom Dies

    Thus did the New York Times’ headline, leaving no doubt as to who the black hats are, describe the proposed Arizona law to permit businesses, on religious grounds, to deny service to same-sex couples.
    Examples of intolerance provided by the Times:
    “In New Mexico, a photographer declined to take pictures of a lesbian couple’s commitment ceremony. In Washington State, a florist would not provide flowers for a same-sex wedding. And in Colorado, a baker refused to make a cake for a party celebrating the wedding of two men.”
    The question Gov. Jan Brewer faces?
    Should Christians, Muslims, Mormons who refuse, on religious grounds, to serve same-sex couples—that photographer, that florist, that baker, for example—be treated as criminals?
    Or should Arizona leave them alone?
    “Religious freedom,” said Daniel Mach of the ACLU to the Times, is “not a blank check to ... impose our faith on our neighbors.”
    True. But who is imposing whose beliefs here? . . .

    Frank Borzellieri On White Liberal Hypocrisy: Smug Diversity Pushers [like Corinne Lestch, Fran Davies, Joseph Zwilling and Timothy McNiff] And The Safe White Neighborhoods They Live In

    Frank Borzellieri On White Liberal Hypocrisy: Smug Diversity Pushers And The Safe White Neighborhoods They Live In
    Fairfax Station, not very diverse...
    The hypocrisy of white liberals over integration and the wonderful enrichment that mass immigration is supposed to bring is the gift that never stops giving. If there is one thing you can be absolutely sure of whenever you hear a white liberal espousing the vital importance of diversity, it is that the same person lives in a safe, lily-white community.
    What was termed “white flight” in the 1950s and 1960s is a demographic fact of life and everyone knows it. No less an unwilling witness than the U.S. government has reported what everyone knows: when the non-white population of a community reaches between 10 and 20 percent, whites simply leave. Whites will not live in non-white neighborhoods in any meaningful percentage.[The Residential Preferences of Blacks and Whites: A Four-Metropolis AnalysisHousing Policy Debate,  January 1997(PDF)]
    I personally, as a libertarian, think all people—black, white, Hispanic, or Asian—should be allowed to live anywhere they want without being browbeaten or forced to live where they don’t want to. My problem is with white liberals who claim that “diversity is strength” but whose actions are very different when it comes to their own lives, their own homes, their own children and their own neighborhoods.
    All of this brings me to the particular white liberal hypocrites who have caused me to be fired as a Catholic school principal, not once but twice, for political writings that were never secret and which Monsignor Michael Hull, the “Censor Librorum” of the New York Archdiocese, had already approved as not in violation of Catholic teaching. . . .

    Monday, February 24, 2014

    Prime Minister David Cameron grovels to the Sikhs: 'The Blame Game' by Francis Carr Begbie - "In other words, they [endless apologies to non-Whites] are an essential part of the cultural and moral revolution that has been taking place in Britain since the election of Tony Blair in 1997. In helping to dismantle Britain’s past and destroy the name of the men who built it and who fought to defend it, we are helping to build our post-nation-state multicultural borderless future."

    The Blame Game

    Prime Minister David Cameron on his visit to Amritsar's Golden Temple where he laid a wreath where Indians were killed by British colonial forces in 1919

    When is an apology not an apology? When it is the British government offering “deep regret” for the supposed misdeeds of its imperial forefathers. The latest mea culpa comes from Prime Minister David Cameron who has apologised to the Sikh community for Britain’s supposed role during the massacre at their holiest shrine, the Golden Temple in Amritsar during a hostage crisis in 1985.
    This came as a surprise to everyone, including most Sikhs, who were unaware of any British involvement when the Indian army raided the temple during the clashes which took place nearly forty years after Indian independence.
    But Prime Minister Cameron has insisted that yes indeed there is something to apologise over. His civil servants had been rooting through the archives and had come up with something suitably incriminating. It turns out that a single British officer was dispatched to the scene at the time of the stand-off and his advice was ignored. So that was the extent of our “colonial interference” on that occasion. Cue fulsome apology. . . .

    New: Squatting for Black History Month - "Free homes. Free license plates. Free everything. That is the plan of the black separatist group called Moorish Nation."

    New: Squatting for Black History Month 

    moorish nation flag

    Free homes. Free license plates. Free everything. That is the plan of the black separatist group called Moorish Nation.

    You may have missed this chapter in Black History Month: In 1787, a bunch of people signed a bunch of agreements — secret and otherwise — that say black people are not required to obey American laws because they are not really citizens of the United States.
    Today, members of the Moorish Nation claim this entitles black people to move into empty houses (don’t call it squatting!), create their own license plates, issue their own drivers licenses, print their own property titles and claim sovereign immunity when they get arrested.
    All without success. But they keep trying all over the country. . . .

    Sunday, February 23, 2014

    The Fulford File | Black History Month At Ole Miss, And The ROOTS Of The Anti-White Movie Industry - "The Age of Obama has brought forth such movies as Django Unchained, 12 Years A Slave, and The Butler, all of which are a kind of 'hate white people' porn."

    The Fulford File | Black History Month At Ole Miss, And The ROOTS Of The Anti-White Movie Industry

    No one uses the expression "as true as a miniseries on a major network."

    It’s another Black History Month and at Ole Miss the iconic statue of Civil Rights icon James Meredith was draped—by someone—with a noose, which is the wrong kind of icon, and makes people crazy.[Vandals put noose on Ole Miss statue of James Meredith; he speaks outBy Paresh Dave, LA Times,  February 18, 2014]
    Just over half a century ago, in 1962, Meredith was the first black student to attend Ole Miss, formally known as The University Of Mississippi. Now blacks make up 15 percent of the students.
    If this turns out to be a "hoax crime"—if the students who did the draping turn out to be minorities—nothing will be done to them, it will just be another exercise in consciousness raising. There was an earlier example on the occasion of the 40thanniversary of the famous desegregation: Another Fake Hate Crime - The Real Race Scandal In MississippiBy Michelle Malkin on December 17, 2002.
    But if the students who did it are white—the authorities have three white suspects—then their lives will be ruined. They could be sent to jail, on the theory that the noose constitutes a credible threat—which it doesn’t—or deprived of any chance for a higher education. . . .

    Saturday, February 22, 2014

    Daniel DiSalvo Book Review on 'The Revolt Atainst the Masses: How Liberalsim Has Undermined the Middle Class' by Fred Siegel

    Gramsci - Google Images

    BOOK REVIEW: Revealing new history of liberalism

    American liberalism has long been a source of fascination, especially for liberals themselves. Because its history has been the subject of countless books, one might think that there is little left to say on the subject. Yet Fred Siegel’s rich new history of liberalism, “The Revolt Against the Masses,” makes an original argument and offers sparkling insights — albeit insights many liberals will be loath to hear — in pungent and pugnacious prose.

    Histories of liberalism have become potted. They begin in the Progressive Era (1900-1916) and then quickly move to the New Deal in the 1930s, hit the high points of the civil rights movement and the Great Society of the 1960s, skirt over the problems of the 1970s and 1980s, and then focus on how liberalism can regain the dominance it deserves today. The focus is usually on the economic dimension and how the American welfare state was constructed to aid the downtrodden.

    In contrast, Mr. Siegel locates the origin of liberalism in the overlooked 1920s and focuses on liberalism’s cultural proclivities. He finds a welter of evidence that liberals have been scorned by the middle class. In short, claims that America was a “sick society” and calls for a cultural revolution long predate the 1960s. . . .

         Interesting review. Many point out that liberalism once favored equal opportunity, but degenerated into demanding equal results. But for liberalism to have so easily morphed into Cultural Marxism, liberalism itself would have had to start out deeply flawed. By the same token, many conservatives argue that we need to return to the original Constitution and the intent of the Framers. But if the Constitution could have been so easily subverted into the suicidal political zoo we see today, there must have been some important flaws at the beginning.

         Or maybe not. Maybe it was just hijacked by the Supreme Court and other culprits. Either way, there is no way to get back to it now, since to the large numbers of people from different cultures and races being force-fed into America, the Constitutional Founders and their beliefs are about as strange and as ill-fitting as it would be if European Americans were expected to recognize the infinite wisdom of a small esteemed group of Africans, Chinese, Muslims or Mexicans of a couple of hundred years ago.  

         The larger issue is that our government, run by our open-borders overlords, both Democrat (to a virulent extreme) and Republican, is now 'electing' a new people by demographically (conveniently helped out by minority-on-White violent crime) displacing and erasing European Americans--very quickly in terms of world history.  

         At the core of this (although of course not an explain-all, given the complexity of human history) is a clash of civilizations well laid out by Kevin MacDonald in 'The Culture of Critique.' To ignore that issue in discussing today's Multicultural Marxism and its rabid Tolerance Police is not only absurd but all too revealing of the fix we are in. 

         Looks hopeless, but some argue that Western nations are now about where the Soviet Union was in the 1980s, when government elites were desperately trying to enforce utopian views that fewer and fewer people actually believed in. Nature will always reassert itself.