Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, California ban on U.S. flag on T-shirts heads to appeals (Jimmy, we'll have none of this American patriotism filth at our school!)

 - - -

                                       Google Images

More flag-related white gang activity? 

Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, school ban on U.S. flag on T-shirts heads to appeals

A Northern California school that banned a handful of students from wearing T-shirts that showcased the U.S. flag on the Hispanic-based holiday, Cinco de Mayo day, is headed to court Thursday, to defend their order that the now-graduated individuals go home and change.

The school’s argument during the 2010 matter was that racial tensions and gang problems plagued the student body at Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, located 20 miles outside of San Jose, The Associated Press reported.

So when administrators caught wind that some of the altercations experienced on Cinco de Mayo day may have been rooted in the wearing of U.S. flag shirts by three students, their reaction was quick: Either turn the tees inside out, or go home and change, they told the kids, AP reported.

The students went home — but the incident played out in the national press as a question of political correctness versus First Amendment freedoms. . . .

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/17/california-school-ban-us-flag-heads-appeals/#ixzz2iJzpiwJ0

Tom Tancredo predicts the Stupid Party will allow another amnesty (demographic genocide is still genocide)

Google Images

ONE GOOD REPUBLICAN FIASCO DESERVES ANOTHER?

Leave it to the Republican Party to turn the Obamacare train wreck into a Republican fiasco. That takes real imagination and crafty leadership. But, hey – it’s all in a day’s work for Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.

And if you think the shutdown fiasco was bad for Republicans, just stay tuned for the next act: the planned amnesty fiasco. . . .

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/one-good-republican-fiasco-deserves-another/#pKUSeFe022XvQ5SW.99

Tobias Langdon: Have some human populations become mosquito-like parasites? (This idea first seemed a bit shocking to me until I recalled that biological natural selection makes no moral hosts v. parasites judgments--it just goes with what works.)

Verbal Venom: Biological Parallels for Western Pathologies


- - -

Tobias Langdon

Stung Out to Die

Here’s a short and very old word: Wasp. Here’s a long and very new word: Neuroparasitology. Despite their differences, the two words go together very well. Neuroparasitology is the study of how parasites manipulate the brains of their hosts. Parasitic wasps are experts at this manipulation. For example, some inject paralysing toxins with their stings and create living larders for their offspring. Mason wasps lay eggs on paralysed caterpillars, then seal them into brood-chambers made of mud. The caterpillars are then eaten alive by the larvae that hatch from the eggs.

Parasitic wasps induce this suicidal passivity with minute injections of neurotoxin, because tiny amounts of chemical can have huge effects on nervous systems. The way a caterpillar submits to being eaten alive is both grotesque and fascinating, but then parasitism is one of the most interesting aspects of biology. Like predators, parasites have spontaneously evolved again and again in the animal kingdom. There are parasitic mammals, birds, fish, insects and more: Think of vampire-bats, cuckoos, lampreys, mosquitoes and so on.

Each species of parasite exploits some particular aspect of its host’s biology. Wasps inject toxins that paralyse nerves; cuckoos lay camouflaged eggs that fool eyes and brains. But this raises a dangerous idea about Homo sapiens. It’s clear from biology that predation and parasitism evolve quickly and easily among animals. All birds have a common ancestor, but some birds, like eagles and shrikes, now prey on their relatives, while others, like cuckoos and skuas, now parasitize their relatives. So why can’t predation and parasitism have evolved among those animals known as human beings? Why can’t there be predatory or parasitic ideologies, professions and even races?

Catch-Twenty-’Koo

One answer might be this: there can’t be because that’s a wicked thing to suggest – it’s bigoted, hateful and racist. But that answer might, in itself, be evidence for the proposition. If parasitism does exist among human beings, it will exploit some particular aspect of our biology. Wasps can easily inject chemicals into the brains of other insects. Human beings can easily inject ideas into the brains of other human beings. They do this using something called language. . . .

Roland Johnson: Are we white people really naturally evil as our schools and Hollywood teach our kids?

Is the West Guilty?



No. We have been fighting for our lives for 1,500 years.

According to the trendy nonsense of our time, the history of Europe and Western Civilization is a legacy of shame. The West bears the mark of Cain for its sins of aggression, colonialism, slavery, and racism. 

It does not matter that the West gave birth to the ideals of liberty and human dignity—and practiced those ideals by eliminating the slave trade and colonial rule. Or that our political systems have promoted freedom around the world, and our science has improved the lives of people everywhere.

For a sense of balance, let us consider the history of non-Western aggression against the West. The fact that so many of us are unaware of these aggressions is proof of the bias of our media and educational systems.

A good place to start is the invasion of Europe by Central-Asian Huns in the fourth and fifth centuries. . . .

http://www.amren.com/features/2013/10/is-the-west-guilty/

Google Images

Your typical white supremacist we all encounter in the grocery store isles each and every day.

- - -

Gilbert Cavanaugh: Race Realism and sorting out paleoconservatives, sane libertarians and pc open-borders libertarians

Google Images

Libertarians and Race Realism

Gilbert Cavanaugh

Who are our potential allies?

For those of us who enjoy a touch of libertarianism, the news of Jared Taylor’s recent appearance at Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Property and Freedom Society was well received. It also begs the valuable question, “Which libertarians are friendly to race realism, and which are not?” As it stands, what Mr. Taylor wroteover a decade ago in his review of Prof. Hoppe’s Democracy: The God That Failed is still (unfortunately) for the most part true: “Libertarians, to the extent they have any influence on American policy, have been bitter opponents of immigration control. From the Cato Institute, to the Libertarian Party, to the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal, their generally laudable opposition to government control leads them to view border control as just one more intolerable act of government tyranny.” However, both then and now, Prof. Hoppe and a small band of allies within the libertarian movement have fought that trend; and they deserve notice for their principled and courageous stance. . . .

http://www.amren.com/features/2013/10/libertarians-and-race-realism/

---

Outrage over China's plans for Mao's birthday (meanwhile the US government has made no similar announcement that the billions of dollars normally lavished on celebrating Multicultural Marxism will be increased on the Chairman's birthday)

Outrage over China's plans for Mao's birthday
Authorities plan to spend more than $2.5 billion celebrating communist leader



(SkyNews) More than $2.5bn (£1.6bn) is being spent on events to mark the 120th anniversary of the birth of Mao Zedong, to the fury of many Chinese citizens.

The money is being directed towards Mao’s birthplace of Shaoshan, where a tourist information centre will be renovated and his former residence restored, according to the Changsha Evening News.

High-speed rail stations and new highways will also be built to impress the expected influx of visitors. . . .

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/outrage-over-chinas-plans-for-maos-birthday/#7zmdkQQtOqs5PV5I.99

Matt Barber: Left's New Crusade: Adult-Kid Sex (with comments from yours truly on 'Lolita')

- - -

Google Images
- - -
MATT BARBER: LEFT'S NEW CRUSADE: ADULT-KID SEX

So much for the left’s “consenting adults” rhetoric on sex. Forever the consummate conservationists, our self-described “progressive” friends at the ACLU, MSNBC and elsewhere have been ramping-up efforts to downsize from “consenting adults” to merely “consenting” – a far less cumbersome qualifier in the noble struggle for unrestrained sexual license.

Tolerating “intergenerational romance” for “minor-attracted” adults is all the rage these days. . . .

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/lefts-new-crusade-adult-kid-sex/#XTOhKDqOM4PQEgdq.99

     This whole idea of minors being able to grant consent for sexual relations with adults is about what you would expect would be the next step in our overlords’ world view that has convinced many of us that it is enlightened and fashionable for whites to be discriminated against on college entrance requirements and jobs, and that Europeans, or the people of Western civilization, should welcome the demographic demise of their own grandkids’ grandkids. 

     Several years after Vladimir Nabokov’s ‘Lolita’ came out I remember one reviewer refer to it as “disturbing.” And it truly is, not just for the sex scenes back in 1955, but because the author forces you to live in the head of a relentless but personable and often funny pedophile, where you are forced to develop a sort of emotional empathy for someone doing something so wrong and disgusting. 

     Even more telling, many reviewers have concluded, as one reviewer did, “And she seduces him!" But did she really? And this relates to this new push to legalize the rape of children.

     Adults, compared to kids, have almost infinite powers of manipulation. So you get some young girl, who, like many youngsters, is desperate for adult approval, particularly from non-family adults. She is also curious about and feeling her first sexual desires and is insecure about but eager to enter the new exciting adult world. 

     So what does Humbert Humbert do? He makes himself the equivalent of a glamorous movie star in the girl’s eyes, and finally puts himself in a position where intimacy is likely to occur--and, surprise, surprise, the girl ‘makes the first move,’ seemingly freeing the pedophile from any responsibility.

     This fictional character's magic trick worked so well that the very name Lolita has ever since often been used as an adjective describing some underage girl as some sort of oversexed nymphet who is bound and determined to seduce and otherwise honorable but humanly vulnerable older man. Apparently Nabokov had no desires on this score. Just an excellent writer who taught readers a lesson about the seductive manipulations of pedophiles. However, many did not learn this lesson, but were cluelessly seduced by the seductions of the fictional molester.   

     And this is the sort of perverted hogwash being served up again by today’s more fashionable Multicultural Marxist child rapists and their political friends. Obviously the larger agenda here is to break down Western civilization by destroying the bonds of the traditional family.