Sunday, June 30, 2013

Paula Deen Case: Latest Anti-White 'Soviet-Style Show Trial'--with backlash?

America’s Reaction To Paula Deen Suggests Elite’s Show Trial Strategy About To Backfire
The soft tyranny of Political Correctness is steadily transforming into outright Cultural Marxist totalitarianism – and it is starting on QVC.
Legal changes are part of it. The hapless “conservative” movement met with three decisive defeats in one week in the “Culture War” it’s been losing for decades. In the name of equality, the Supreme Court ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, to the hypocritical cheers of those who had put it into law. Of course, though equality is great when it comes to gay marriage, the Supreme Court also decreed that anti-white (and anti-Asian) racial preferences continue.
More importantly, the Senate voted to pass a nation-breaking amnesty, though that battle is really just beginning.
However, the most critical milestone in America's transformation from a First World free country into just another Third World dystopia may be the Soviet-style Show Trial of a beloved southern chef and entrepreneur: Paula Deen. . . .

Google Images
Past beneficiaries of Soviet show-trial justice
     It is always amazing to see how willing these celebrities are to get down on their hands and knees and crawl and grovel, when the intolerant Tolerance Police will never forgive them anyway. 

HANSON: The U.S. is coasting on the fumes of past greatness (yet little mention of racial taboo)

HANSON: The U.S. is coasting on the fumes of past greatness, following the Roman road to ruins

Illustration by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times
The Washington Times

By A.D. 200, the Roman republic was a distant memory. Few citizens of the global Roman Empire even knew of their illustrious ancestors such as Scipio or Cicero. Millions no longer spoke Latin. Italian emperors were rare. There were no national elections.

Yet Rome endured as a global power for three more centuries. What held it together?

A stubborn common popular culture and the prosperity of Mediterranean-wide standardization kept things going. The Egyptian, the Numidian, the Iberian and the Greek assumed that everything from Roman clay lamps and glass to good roads and plentiful grain were available to millions throughout the Mediterranean.

As long as the sea was free of pirates, thieves cleared from the roads, and merchants allowed to profit, few cared whether the lawless Caracalla or the unhinged Elagabalus was emperor in distant Rome.

Something likewise both depressing and encouraging is happening to the United States. Few Americans seem to worry that our leaders have lied to or misled Congress and the American people without consequences.

Most young people cannot distinguish the First Amendment from the Fourth Amendment — and do not worry that they cannot. Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln are mere names of grammar schools but otherwise unidentifiable to most.

Separatism is thought to bring dividends. In California, universities conduct separate graduation ceremonies predicated on race — sometimes difficult given the increasingly mixed ancestry of Americans.

As in Rome, there is a vast disconnect between elites and the common people. Almost half of Americans receive some sort of public assistance, and half pay no federal income tax. About one-seventh of Americans are on food stamps.

Yet housing prices in elite enclaves — Manhattan, Cambridge, Santa Monica, Palo Alto — are soaring. The wealthy like to cocoon themselves in Roman-like villas, safe from the real-life ramifications of their own utopian ideology. . . . 

     "Officially, America celebrates diversity; privately, America is fragmenting into racial, political and ideological camps."

     So true. Neocons and libertarians can write beautifully about painfully true realities, and yet always leaving out or only briefly touching upon the core problem. Rome, as well and Egypt and Greece, fell when its founding genetic stock was assimilated away, even if it took a couple of hundred years or so of their pathetically teetering along before the end finally came. This process is now taking place in all Western 'Celebrate Diversity!' nations. 

     Although the next big evil mass amnesty will mean signing America's demographic death certificate as a Western nation, invasion and vastly differential birthrates have already locked into place our doom, even if European Americans were to double their current birthrate. 

     There will eventually need to be a one or more white ethno-states or the West will be gone as much as the people of Easter Island are now just so many stone heads facing out to sea, no doubt to be studied by archaeologists and historians from future advanced nations of coherent peoples and cultures, such as Japan or China.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

South African Girl, 13, whacks robber with walking stick (Let's appoint Jemma de Gaspary US Secretary of Homeland Security)

Girl, 13, whacks robber with walking stick

teen hero

Durban - A brave 13-year-old girl repeatedly kicked and hit a robber on his head with a walking stick to stop him from throttling her granny.
These people are always said to be 'robbers'--never murderers. 
Jemma de Gaspary said on Thursday she had not hesitated to fight off the robber because it was a matter of life and death for her 75-year-old gran, Elizabeth Shepherd.
Since the robbery on Wednesday afternoon, the Grade 8 pupil at St Mary’s Diocesan School for Girls, Kloof, has been sleeping with her baseball bat next to her.
More and more whites around the world will be partaking in that adventure. 
Shepherd, who sustained bruises to her neck, said the robber had gained entry into her well-secured Gillitts complex through the front door.
She said she had gone to the doctor and then fetched Jemma from her home, a few streets away, to visit her for the afternoon.
Her 81-year-old husband, Roy, a financial consultant, was at work.
Shepherd said: “It was about 4pm when we returned home. The front door was unlocked. But I did not think anything because the maid was still there.”
As she entered the house, Shepherd said she saw someone move very quickly into her bedroom.
“I thought it was the maid. I walked in her direction to go to speak to her. As I entered my bedroom I saw a young man crouching at the side of the bed,” she said, adding the domestic worker had been in the toilet when the robber gained entry into the complex.
How convenient  Doesn't say race of maid, but typically it is a trusted black domestic worker who allows home-invasion robber-murderers inside
The entire room had been ransacked and the couple’s belongings were strewn on the floor and bed. Shepherd said the robber must have been in the house for at least 15 minutes. She screamed when she saw him and tried to run.
“He came after me. He grabbed me from behind and began throttling me. I tried to fight him off but he just tightened his grip around my neck.”
Jemma, alerted by her grandmother’s screams, ran to help.
“He was throttling my gran and I could see that she was battling to breathe. I charged right at him. I kicked him and screamed at him to let my gran go. I told him that he was hurting her.”
She said that when the robber failed to release her granny, she ran down the passage and fetched one of her grandfather’s walking sticks.
“I whacked him repeatedly on the head with the stick and kicked him on the hip. He did not know what was happening. I doubt he expected to get a hiding.”
Jemma said the robber ripped her grandmother’s gold and pearl necklace from her neck.
“I ran outside with the stick and waited for him. When he came out of the house I started hitting him again. He tried to grab me but I just hit back even harder. He eventually gave up and ran off.”
She said she chased after him, but he disappeared down the street. Shepherd said her granddaughter was a “brave young girl”.
“She was relentless. She hammered him with the walking stick. Her grandfather collects walking sticks. She chose the biggest and fattest one to launch her attack. I am really proud of her and grateful that no harm came to her.”
Shepherd said Jemma had called the police, but they only pitched at 7pm - three hours later.
Arrived in the nick of time. 
“Thankfully our neighbours and community came to our assistance. They were fantastic.”
This is the second time Shepherd has been attacked. In April she was fetching her mail from her box at the Gillitts post office when she was choked by a thief.
Typical South African white person's taped-to-the-fridge To-Do List: feed cat; water plants; pick up mail; get chocked ...
“He just came up from behind me. He said, ‘sorry to interrupt you’, and seconds later he was choking me.” Shepherd said her screams foiled his attempt to steal her jewellery.
“This is all too much for me. I am not safe in or outside my house. I stay indoors with everything locked and bolted; I cannot live like this. At our age it is also an impossible task to move. We are like sitting ducks.”
Says it all. Yet where is all this ever reported in most of the mainstream media?
Jemma described crime as “bad” in KwaZulu-Natal and said her worst fear was that criminals were getting “smarter and smarter”, finding new ways to commit crime.
Desperate to divide up the last of the white honey pot. 
“That is terrifying because we do not know when they are going to strike, and how.”
Police confirmed the incident.
Nikki Moolman, of the Ward 10 (Kloof) safety and security committee, said they were concerned about the high crime rate.
Moolman said they had written to Community Safety and Liaison MEC Willies Mchunu to redeploy the police Tactical Response Team (TRT) to the area.
Yep, just keep writing them letters.
Daily News

Friday, June 28, 2013

Why does Harold Myerson of The Washington Post hate European Americans?

Harold Meyerson hates White America

Pat Buchanan asks “Does the South Belong in the  Union?” Like Buchanan, I have noticed a lot of liberal angst that the Supreme Court removed the requirement that any change in voting requirements be approved by the Justice Department. Buchanan points his pen at Harold Myerson, the White-hating columnist of The Washington Post.
Consider Wednesday’s offering by Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson. The South, he writes, is the home of “so-called right-to-work laws” and hostility to the union shop, undergirded by “the virulent racism of the white Southern establishment,” a place where a “right-wing antipathy toward workers’ rights” is pandemic. …
Were a conservative to use the term “black” as a slur the way Meyerson spits out the word “white,” he would be finished at the Post. Meyerson’s summation:
“If the federal government wants to build a fence that keeps the United States safe from the danger of lower wages and poverty and their attendant ills — and the all-round fruitcakery of the right-wing white South — it should build that fence from Norfolk to Dallas. There is nothing wrong with a fence as long as you put it in the right place.”
Meyerson’s hatred for the White South is not at all surprising. He also hates the White North, East, and West. Here’s a quote from one of Meyerson’s previous articles.
The GOP’s last best hope remains identity politics. In a year when the Democrats have an African American presidential nominee, the Republicans now more than ever are the white folks’ party, the party that delays the advent of our multicultural future, the party of the American past. Republican conventions have long been bastions of de facto Caucasian exclusivity, but coming right after the diversity of Denver, this year’s GOP convention is almost shockingly — un-Americanly — white. Long term, this whiteness is a huge problem. This year, however, whiteness is the only way Republicans cling to power. If the election is about the economy, they’re cooked — and their silence this week on nearly all things economic means that they know it. (seehere)
Virtually by definition, the multicultural future will have identity politics—just not for Whites if Meyerson has his way. ...

Pittsburgh celebrates diversity by beating up white teens, stealing their shoes and posting it on video

Caught On Camera: Police Say Teen Beaten For Shoes, And Web Notoriety

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — Local recreation centers are supposed to be safe places for kids and teens, but what happened outside the rec center in Brookline is now the subject of a police investigation.
The popular facility is a haven for teenage boys, who come to play hoops and football outside, and a lot more inside – a million dollar community investment paying off, until this.
Police say the incident happened in broad daylight along Brookline Boulevard. A 15-year-old boy was at the center to play some hoops.
That’s when a group of African-American teenage boys approached the white victim and began beating him, allegedly to steal his basketball shoes, and for website notoriety. . . .
Google Images

Thursday, June 27, 2013

UK celebrates diversity by FINALLY prosecuting the Oxford sex grooming gang

Oxford sex grooming gang jailed for life

Oxford sex gang: girls as young as 11 'forced into prostitution'

Members of an Oxford gang who groomed vulnerable young girls for sex, repeatedly raping them and threatening to kill them if they told anyone, have been jailed for life.

The seven men, including two sets of brothers, had been found guilty last month of a catalogue of offences including rape, trafficking and organising prostitution.

Sentencing the men at the Old Bailey on Thursday, Judge Peter Rook said: “These were sexual crimes of the upmost gravity. The depravity was extreme, each victim was groomed, coerced and intimidated.”

Judge Rook jailed brothers Akhtar Dogar, 32, and Anjum Dogar, 31, for a minimum of 17 years telling them they had been found guilty of “exceptionally grave crimes”.

Mohammed Karrar, 38, of Kames Close, Oxford, will serve at least 20 years after being convicted of 18 offences including child rape and trafficking. Bassam Karrar, 34, of Hundred Acres Close, Oxford, will serve at least 15 years.

Co-defendant Kamar Jamil, 27, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 12 years. . . .

   Is it just me or does this article heading sound as if the entire gang was jailed for life, when it does not seem as if anyone was so jailed, if you take into account the "minimum term" of the few who did get 'life'?

     These sorts of things always show how hostile the ruling elites of Western nations have become. Apparently law enforcement and social services were letting this slide for a long time. Now imagine what would have happened it we were to reverse the players and white Christians had been practicing this sort of sex slavery against innocent Muslim girls. The UK would have shut down for a day of mourning, with the pulling of hair, the gnashing of teeth and the rending of garments, topped off by the Queen issuing a tearful apology while wearing a burqa.  

     Meanwhile our 'leaders' are literally willing to see us raped, prostituted, mugged, murdered and of course unemployed and generally dispossessed in order to maintain the ruling order and its rabid open-borders policies intended to end Western civilization and its peoples. And these evil fools have been unbelievably successful--so far. 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Big black coward in Millburn, New Jersey celebrates diversity by using white woman as punching bag (correction: and kicking bag) -- Video

Terrifying New Jersey home invasion and beating caught on homeowner's nanny cam (VIDEO)

A woman silently endures a brutal attack and robbery Friday in Millburn while her 3-year-old daughter watches from the couch and her 18-month-old sleeps upstairs.

 Police say the robber stole the woman's wedding ring among other items.

If you can stomach it, video at link below.

     A brutal mid-morning New Jersey home invasion, complete with an assault and robbery, 

was caught on tape when the homeowner's nanny camera recorded the incident.

     The woman's 3-year-old daughter sat on the couch during the ordeal, helpless as her 

mother suffered a vicious beating at the hands of the 5-foot-11, 210-pound suspect.

    Police say the hefty black male, who had a salt-and-pepper beard, took off with an 

undetermined amount of jewelry following the 10:30 a.m. attack Friday in Millburn. The 

woman's 18-month-old toddler reportedly slept upstairs during the beating, Capt. Michael 

Palardy told the Daily News.

     “Her love for the children kept her going,” Palardy said of the brave mom, who suffered 

chipped teeth, a concussion and had her face stitched up. . . .

The Founding Conservatives by David Lefer (But why has conservatism failed so miserably to fight Multicultural Marxism?)

Google Images

William F. Buckley, foremost rhetorical 'conservative'

By David Lefer
Sentinel, $29.95, 406 pages

In this splendid narrative history centered largely in the years between the Declaration of Independence and the ratification of our Constitution, David Lefer, historian and professor at New York University’s Polytechnic Institute, points out that it was a chaotic period, in many ways not dissimilar to our own, “a time of war without end; of real estate crashes, rampant speculation, and mounting public debt; of popular outrage at bankers and merchants … of bitter disputes over taxation; and of such animosity between left and right that it frequently left Congress paralyzed for months on end.”

Given the turbulence and the recognizable similarities, writes Mr. Lefer, “it’s unsurprising that the Founders reacted more like us than their impassive marble likenesses would lead us to believe.” This will no doubt upset many of what Mr. Lefer calls “consensus historians.” But that, in part, may be one of his objectives.

To bring the period and its complexities to life, Mr. Lefer takes us behind those “impassive marble likenesses” and focuses largely on the men, neglected by history, he thinks are the “unsung heroes” of our Revolution.

Among them, John Dickinson of Pennsylvania, drafter of the Articles of Confederation . . .

As for theme, writes Mr. Lefer, “This book makes three main arguments. First is that the founding conservatives saved the American Revolution . Second, the founding conservatives brought modern capitalism to America.” And third, “we should no longer look to Britain for the origins of American conservatism. Modern conservatism was born at the moment of independence [and] America’s conservative heritage reflects our nation’s unique history and culture.” . . .

     The major knock against democracies is that they degenerate into mob rule, with ever larger numbers of people voting themselves ever greater public benefits. And yet, lucky us, we have been experiencing the worst of both worlds. 

     On the one hand, we have indeed been degenerating into mob rule, while on the other, our hostile ruling elites, many of them 'conservative,' often have been much more radical than the European American majority, who oftentimes demonstrates a common sense conservationism on things like open borders, massive legal immigration, affirmative action/discrimination against whites, law enforcement, etc, but who are then completely and contemptuously ignored by their smirking elected 'leaders.' 

     A big part of this is that while capitalism in some form is needed for economic freedom, it can also have radical mob-rule tendencies, which we have seen with many mainstream fast-buck cheap-labor open-borders globalist 'conservatives' and neoconservatives. 

Google Images
Enjoys purging its writers who dare to be conservative.

     Yes, by all means, gun rights, but isn't this a deliberate firing-up-the-Right distraction? Once the US and other Western nations are overwhelmingly made up of third-world populations, how long will guns protect whites against hostile (eventually including local) governments, confiscatory taxation, home invasion robberies, rapes and murders (even with a gun, you only have to slip up once, allow one opening and you and your family are gone) and being burned out by fire. White farmers in Africa have found that owning a gun doesn't help all that much once they are standing on top of a pile of ashes. 

      If the giants of modern conservationism, like William F. Buckley and his Nation Review, cannot see the connection between conservatism and saving Western civilization, it makes conservatism more deceptively dangerous than liberalism or Multicultural Marxism that at least openly tries to dilute and destabilize the West at every turn, and is overwhelmingly winning--for now. 

     Recall that Soviet Communism was once considered in the vanguard of history. How could anything so well intentioned fail? Of course this is the problem with any government utopia: eventual failure is built-in. 

Justices Reconfirm: Discrimination Against Whites is OK (at least whites will someday be ruled by hostile nonwhites instead of hostile whites)

Justices Reconfirm: Discrimination Against Whites is OK

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, June 25, 2013
How preferences have to work.
                          How preferences have to work.
A defeat in the form of a compromise.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas has generated headlines about “compromise” and “partial victory for the foes of affirmative action,” but it is not that at all. It is an out-and-out affirmation of the right to discriminate against white students (and sometimes Asians) in the name of “diversity.” David Hinojosa of MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund) got it right when he said, “It’s a great decision by the court reaffirming diversity as a compelling interest.”
If even this allegedly “conservative” Supreme Court is not willing to ban racial discrimination against whites, it is hard to imagine any future Supreme Court that will. The most recently appointed justice, Elena Kagen, did not take part in the decision because she argued for discrimination against whites when she was solicitor general, and it is impossible to imagine any justice appointed by a Democrat—and what other kind are we likely to get?—voting to strike down “affirmative action.” This could be the high-water mark for the Supreme Court’s partial and inadequate rollback of the race-preferences policies under which whites have suffered for the last 40 years.
The court piously denounced racial “quotas,” and reaffirmed that discrimination must be “narrowly tailored” to achieve its goals, and may be resorted to only when non-racial tricks to achieve racial diversity don’t work. This is all the loophole a racial zealot needs. That is why UT President William Powers said he was “encouraged” by the ruling, and notes that it won’t effect admissions policies at all.
So what actually happened?  . . .

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

“Let Them Drink Toilet Water”—Gang Of Eight Bill Means Population Tsunami (The Locust Swarm Eight?)

Google Images 

“Let Them Drink Toilet Water”—Gang Of Eight Bill Means Population Tsunami

used to be a Democrat. I still am an environmentalist. It doesn’t surprise me when my former fellow-Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer salivates about two million-strong Mexican mobsassembling on the Washington mall to intimidate Americans: theAmnesty/ Immigration Surge bill is designed literally to crowd out the historic American nation. The politics of this—the drive to Elect a New People—have been extensively discussed on But the population aspect—the tsunami of people that would be allowed in by this bill—deserves attention too.
Obviously any serious environmentalists would worry about the danger inherent in importing enormous numbers of people, especially from the Third World to the First where their use of resources normally increases greatly. After all, greater material consumption is why most immigrants come, though we call it “searching for a better life.”
But these days, “global warming” has become almost the sole issue in Establishment environmentalism. Population issues have been purged, because it is not PC to say America is full up.
I was part of a movement among grassroots Sierra Club membersthat worked for years to return the organization to being a voice for domestic overpopulation concerns. Unfortunately, the normal democratic process for reform had been undermined by a secret bribe of $100 million to suppress mention of the connection between excessive immigration and environmental harm.
When business special interests and non-white racial nationalistswrote this Open Borders plus Amnesty bill of their dreams, all the conspirators got what they wanted. Any "compromise" simply meant more handouts, from La Raza to the Chamber of Commerce.
As a result, the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” bill is a monstrous Leviathan of more cheap workers, more Democrats, more union members, more taxes, more shoppers, more pavement—and, above all, more people. The base-line estimate, taken from a recent CBO report that immigration enthusiasts actually touted as favorable to their cause: a stunning 46 million persons in the next two decades [Senate bill allows 46 million immigrants by 2033, says CBO, by Neil Munro, Daily Caller, June 19, 2013]
During the mark-up of the legislation in May, Schumer deflectedSenator Jeff Sessions’ question about the numbers allowed in the “new legal flow” by announcing: “They’re coming. They’re either coming under law or not under law. And what we do is try to rationalize that system.”
In other words, this bad-faith bill explicitly eliminates borders and enforcement—it just calls the result “legal immigration.” A massivelyincreased future flow from the Third World is the goal of the Gang of Eight bill. The 10 (20?) million illegal aliens to be legalized are just the beginning.
We already know what the future will look like if America becomes aboarding house: my home state of California—or as we now call it “Crowdifornia.”  . . .
Already, overuse of natural resources has led to expensive and taxpayer-funded “solutions” like “toilet-to-tap” water recycling in southern California.
First World America could water take for granted. But with increasing population, critical resource shortages are emerging across America as infrastructure breaks down under the strain.
For example, in 2007, Georgia had such a severe drought that itsued the Army Corps of Engineers to release more water for use, along with ordering mandatory restrictions for households. But nobody in the Main Stream Media mentioned that water users in the state had doubled since 1960, from four to eight million.
For an issue that affects American society so profoundly, the Amnesty/ Immigration Surge debate has been remarkably narrow. The public emphasis of proponents and their MSM megaphone has been on the poor little foreign lawbreakers and how they must be “brought out of the shadows”—even though a May Gallup pollshowed citizens’ overwhelming concerns were the economy and jobs.
Among the issues being ignored are cultural fragmentation, lack ofpatriotic assimilation, immediate costs to taxpayers for services and infrastructure, harm to citizen workers, increased crime and erosion of sovereignty.
But the basic ingredients of civilized life—including even the availability of water—are also endangered by mass immigration. Current difficulties will seem miniscule when the elites’ immigration tsunami hits.
The Gang of Eight's bill isn't just evil—it's incoherent, with all the problems that come from being written by a committee, especially one comprised of groups who despise the historic American nation.
Only grassroots pressure can stop this bill—and make sure America is something more than a multicultural mess reduced to drinking the toilet water.