Sunday, October 20, 2013

Tom Tancredo predicts the Stupid Party will allow another amnesty (demographic genocide is still genocide)



Google Images

ONE GOOD REPUBLICAN FIASCO DESERVES ANOTHER?

Leave it to the Republican Party to turn the Obamacare train wreck into a Republican fiasco. That takes real imagination and crafty leadership. But, hey – it’s all in a day’s work for Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.
And if you think the shutdown fiasco was bad for Republicans, just stay tuned for the next act: the planned amnesty fiasco. . . .

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/one-good-republican-fiasco-deserves-another/#pKUSeFe022XvQ5SW.99

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Tobias Langdon: Have some human populations become mosquito-like parasites? (This idea first seemed a bit shocking to me until I recalled that biological natural selection makes no moral hosts v. parasites judgments--it just goes with what works.)


Verbal Venom: Biological Parallels for Western Pathologies

SONY DSC
- - -

Tobias Langdon


Stung Out to Die

Here’s a short and very old word: Wasp. Here’s a long and very new word: Neuroparasitology. Despite their differences, the two words go together very well. Neuroparasitology is the study of how parasites manipulate the brains of their hosts. Parasitic wasps are experts at this manipulation. For example, some inject paralysing toxins with their stings and create living larders for their offspring. Mason wasps lay eggs on paralysed caterpillars, then seal them into brood-chambers made of mud. The caterpillars are then eaten alive by the larvae that hatch from the eggs.


Parasitic wasps induce this suicidal passivity with minute injections of neurotoxin, because tiny amounts of chemical can have huge effects on nervous systems. The way a caterpillar submits to being eaten alive is both grotesque and fascinating, but then parasitism is one of the most interesting aspects of biology. Like predators, parasites have spontaneously evolved again and again in the animal kingdom. There are parasitic mammals, birds, fish, insects and more: Think of vampire-bats, cuckoos, lampreys, mosquitoes and so on.
Each species of parasite exploits some particular aspect of its host’s biology. Wasps inject toxins that paralyse nerves; cuckoos lay camouflaged eggs that fool eyes and brains. But this raises a dangerous idea about Homo sapiens. It’s clear from biology that predation and parasitism evolve quickly and easily among animals. All birds have a common ancestor, but some birds, like eagles and shrikes, now prey on their relatives, while others, like cuckoos and skuas, now parasitize their relatives. So why can’t predation and parasitism have evolved among those animals known as human beings? Why can’t there be predatory or parasitic ideologies, professions and even races?
Catch-Twenty-’Koo

One answer might be this: there can’t be because that’s a wicked thing to suggest – it’s bigoted, hateful and racist. But that answer might, in itself, be evidence for the proposition. If parasitism does exist among human beings, it will exploit some particular aspect of our biology. Wasps can easily inject chemicals into the brains of other insects. Human beings can easily inject ideas into the brains of other human beings. They do this using something called language. . . .




Roland Johnson: Are we white people really naturally evil as our schools and Hollywood teach our kids?


Is the West Guilty?

MongolEmpire

No. We have been fighting for our lives for 1,500 years.

According to the trendy nonsense of our time, the history of Europe and Western Civilization is a legacy of shame. The West bears the mark of Cain for its sins of aggression, colonialism, slavery, and racism. 

It does not matter that the West gave birth to the ideals of liberty and human dignity—and practiced those ideals by eliminating the slave trade and colonial rule. Or that our political systems have promoted freedom around the world, and our science has improved the lives of people everywhere.

For a sense of balance, let us consider the history of non-Western aggression against the West. The fact that so many of us are unaware of these aggressions is proof of the bias of our media and educational systems.
A good place to start is the invasion of Europe by Central-Asian Huns in the fourth and fifth centuries. . . .


Google Images
Your typical white supremacist we all encounter in the grocery store isles each and every day.


- - -

Gilbert Cavanaugh: Race Realism and sorting out paleoconservatives, sane libertarians and pc open-borders libertarians




Google Images

Libertarians and Race Realism

Gilbert Cavanaugh
Who are our potential allies?
For those of us who enjoy a touch of libertarianism, the news of Jared Taylor’s recent appearance at Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Property and Freedom Society was well received. It also begs the valuable question, “Which libertarians are friendly to race realism, and which are not?” As it stands, what Mr. Taylor wroteover a decade ago in his review of Prof. Hoppe’s Democracy: The God That Failed is still (unfortunately) for the most part true: “Libertarians, to the extent they have any influence on American policy, have been bitter opponents of immigration control. From the Cato Institute, to the Libertarian Party, to the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal, their generally laudable opposition to government control leads them to view border control as just one more intolerable act of government tyranny.” However, both then and now, Prof. Hoppe and a small band of allies within the libertarian movement have fought that trend; and they deserve notice for their principled and courageous stance. . . .



---

Friday, October 18, 2013

Outrage over China's plans for Mao's birthday (meanwhile the US government has made no similar announcement that the billions of dollars normally lavished on celebrating Multicultural Marxism will be increased on the Chairman's birthday)


Outrage over China's plans for Mao's birthday
Authorities plan to spend more than $2.5 billion celebrating communist leader



(SkyNews) More than $2.5bn (£1.6bn) is being spent on events to mark the 120th anniversary of the birth of Mao Zedong, to the fury of many Chinese citizens.
The money is being directed towards Mao’s birthplace of Shaoshan, where a tourist information centre will be renovated and his former residence restored, according to the Changsha Evening News.
High-speed rail stations and new highways will also be built to impress the expected influx of visitors. . . .
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/outrage-over-chinas-plans-for-maos-birthday/#7zmdkQQtOqs5PV5I.99

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Matt Barber: Left's New Crusade: Adult-Kid Sex (with comments from yours truly on 'Lolita')

- - -

Google Images
- - -
MATT BARBER: LEFT'S NEW CRUSADE: ADULT-KID SEX
So much for the left’s “consenting adults” rhetoric on sex. Forever the consummate conservationists, our self-described “progressive” friends at the ACLU, MSNBC and elsewhere have been ramping-up efforts to downsize from “consenting adults” to merely “consenting” – a far less cumbersome qualifier in the noble struggle for unrestrained sexual license.
Tolerating “intergenerational romance” for “minor-attracted” adults is all the rage these days. . . .

http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/lefts-new-crusade-adult-kid-sex/#XTOhKDqOM4PQEgdq.99

     This whole idea of minors being able to grant consent for sexual relations with adults is about what you would expect would be the next step in our overlords’ world view that has convinced many of us that it is enlightened and fashionable for whites to be discriminated against on college entrance requirements and jobs, and that Europeans, or the people of Western civilization, should welcome the demographic demise of their own grandkids’ grandkids. 

     Several years after Vladimir Nabokov’s ‘Lolita’ came out I remember one reviewer refer to it as “disturbing.” And it truly is, not just for the sex scenes back in 1955, but because the author forces you to live in the head of a relentless but personable and often funny pedophile, where you are forced to develop a sort of emotional empathy for someone doing something so wrong and disgusting. 

     Even more telling, many reviewers have concluded, as one reviewer did, “And she seduces him!" But did she really? And this relates to this new push to legalize the rape of children.

     Adults, compared to kids, have almost infinite powers of manipulation. So you get some young girl, who, like many youngsters, is desperate for adult approval, particularly from non-family adults. She is also curious about and feeling her first sexual desires and is insecure about but eager to enter the new exciting adult world. 

     So what does Humbert Humbert do? He makes himself the equivalent of a glamorous movie star in the girl’s eyes, and finally puts himself in a position where intimacy is likely to occur--and, surprise, surprise, the girl ‘makes the first move,’ seemingly freeing the pedophile from any responsibility.

     This fictional character's magic trick worked so well that the very name Lolita has ever since often been used as an adjective describing some underage girl as some sort of oversexed nymphet who is bound and determined to seduce and otherwise honorable but humanly vulnerable older man. Apparently Nabokov had no desires on this score. Just an excellent writer who taught readers a lesson about the seductive manipulations of pedophiles. However, many did not learn this lesson, but were cluelessly seduced by the seductions of the fictional molester.   

     And this is the sort of perverted hogwash being served up again by today’s more fashionable Multicultural Marxist child rapists and their political friends. Obviously the larger agenda here is to break down Western civilization by destroying the bonds of the traditional family. 



Where are our flying cars and robot sex slaves?! by Kathy Shaidle (and yours truly)

- - -


- - -

Google Images

Robot Hookers of the Near Future

by Kathy Shaidle 

Robot Hookers of the Near Future
- - -
Jean Harlow’s final, deliciously pre-Code exchange with matronly Marie Dressler in 1933’s Dinner at Eight endures as one of cinema’s choicest comedy morsels.

Harlow’s Kitty, a ditzy platinum blonde gold digger, fairly knocks Dressler’s Carlotta off her feet when she pipes up:

Kitty: I was reading a book the other day.

Carlotta: Reading a book?!

Kitty: Yes. It’s all about civilization or something. A nutty kind of a book. Do you know that the guy says that machinery is going to take the place of every profession?

Carlotta: (Looks Kitty up and down) Oh, my dear, that’s something you need never worry about.

It’s funny cuz it’s true—but for how much longer? . . .


“‘Where’s my flying car?’ jokes every barstool bore ever. We already have “flying cars,” moron. They’re called ‘helicopters.’ Personal aviation technology isn’t what’s lagging—it’s the infrastructure of chopper-friendly landing pads and fueling stations(and reams of new legislation, regulation, and insurance underwriting) that would make them feasible automobile substitutes.” . . .




     But these are not really the greatest problems. The problems forgotten by Kathy Shaidle and futurologists alike, overpopulation and resource limitations, are the same reasons why most futurology is utopian bunk. 

     Just having come back from a harrowing drive to San Francisco and back for a doctor’s appointment, leaving at 4 a.m. and arriving at 8:45 a.m., for what should really been a three-hour trip, the only worse thing I can imagine is if everyone had been using countless flying cars.  

     On the approach to the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza, one driver–happened to be black–was so involved with talking and laughing with his female passenger that his back was to his left side window, from which he would occasionally reach back out of and place his drink on the car's rooftop, as he was moving, and merging in the ever-narrowing and disappearing lanes as we approached the toll booths. 

     I just visited someplace called the Helicopter Forum and it says that you can get a small used helicopter for 150,000 dollars. Who knows, maybe greater mass production could bring them down to $100,000. I’ll have to wait until I have a little more in my checking. Even sane intelligent people tend to forget that prices are partly a factor of scarce resources. For example the cost of labor and technology reflects the availability of those resources. 

     Of course when you talk about being satisfied by a sexual robot, a person may be be talking about something with semi-functional orifices and/or protuberances. That’s one thing. But I would surmise that anything approaching human robots is way, way in the future. When they have carried out this competition, I guess it is, where people will sit down and have a conversation with someone not knowing if they are human or robot, some people are fooled, but, tellingly, it is usually people wishfully thinking that a human is a robot. 

     One factor is that humans are very, what would you call it, agile and particularistic. As one person pointed out, you might tell some unknown entity that you were born in, say, Tucson, Arizona. A human might likely instantly start rattling on about how his brother-in-law lives in Tucson, and do you know about some crazy biker bar out on 210, or the like. While a robot would maybe tell you that the largest employer in Tucson is Raytheon Missile Systems. That could be reprogrammed, but you’d run into the same problem down the line, where the robot side of the conversation would at least sound stilted. 

     Although not all futurology is utopian rather than dystopian, most is and reveals that two of the main factors that built Western civilization, extreme optimism and individualism, which obviously have natural selection advantages among Westerners and in competing with other groups as groups, is now one of the major things destroying the West. Since resource limitations and being thoroughly mixed up with and overrun with non-Westerners changes the rules. 

     Whites are sort of like some exotic flightless island birds that suddenly find that they are the main course in a big buffet for newly introduced carnivorous land animals. These big colorful fluffy birds keep endearingly doing what has always worked for thousands of years in the past. They think to themselves, ‘Be very quiet. Stand very still. Blend in. Be very quiet . . .’ Until, GULP!–the last one is gone.

     So the final problem, very rarely grasped by futurologists or their critics, is that most of these exciting future predictions, like flying cars or lifelike robots, will have to be developed in places like Japan or China, once Western nations have completed their demographic decline into third-world nations. Just as Rhodesia and South Africa are sinking ever farther down into the corrupt violent ignorant fetid pre-Western civilization swamp.