Churches and mosques want more members, look to immigrants/refugees
….but more importantly immigrants are jihadists in Islamic teaching. And, in my opinion, this form of jihad is the most significant form (more significant than the violent jihad that makes the news) in determining the future of the western world.
I have a couple of articles from this week that I am not going to have the time to pick apart for you. So please have a look at them yourselves (there must be a PR push on to show how wonderfully immigrants are expanding church and mosque membership rolls).
However, in one of the stories (at Deseret News), near the very end is a quote from an American legal scholar, a Muslim, I wanted to be sure not to skip.
Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, an Emory law professor, is quoted saying this about mosques:
An-Na’im said a similar situation [squabbling between churches–ed] can be found in communities of Muslims from various countries. “To assume all Muslims can get along fine is misleading; when you talk about the Claxton and the Somali community, people who share the language, history and culture — (you find) totally isolated Mosques. Some will not enter the next mosque no matter what.”
So all Muslims in America don’t really get along (I think we get that). Was the good professor trying to say all Muslims are just like those church-goers who squabble periodically.
But, they aren’t. Muslims have a longer world view. Who cares if they don’t always see eye-to-eye on a daily basis—their end game is the same!
This next quote from An-Na’im, that most of us might think is an insignificant bit of history, is indeed the motivating factor for all Muslim migration in the world, between countries and even between smaller jurisdictions, known as Hijra.
According to the authors of ‘Modern Trojan Horse, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration‘, Immigration is Jihad and it is incumbent on all Muslims to follow Muhammad’s example.
So here is An-Na’im in what might look like a throwaway line in the Deseret News article. Was An-Na’im expressing something very important?
In response, An-Na’im mentioned the “centrality of migration in Islam, where the Prophet is the ultimate immigrant.” He said the Muslim calendar commences on the day of Muhammad’s migration (hijira) from Mecca to Medina.
Here is what Solomon and Al Maqdisi say in Trojan Horse (p.14):
(Emphasis is mine)
It has been reported that Muhammad stated, “Migration cannot be ended as long as there is kufr (unbelief) or as long as there is an enemy that resists.” (kenz al Umal 46274). In other words, as long as there are communities out there that are non-Muslim, where Islam is not regarded as a supreme system, then jihad must continue. Jihad may be manifested in various forms but all of it would have one aim and that is to establish the supremacy of Islam. Hence Muhammad made it clear that migration is a duty that needs to be upheld forever or until the earth has submitted to the Islamic hegemony.
So while churches may wish to see their congregations grow for simple reasons like finances (see the Pittsburgh Burundians I didn’t get time to post on), there is a whole different agenda going on with mushrooming mosques and their growing immigrant Islamic flocks. Their time table may be a long one, but frankly, they plan to take us over one day. ...
Posts
