Google Images
Norway vs. Sweden on immigration: The importance of becoming part of the mainstream
no doubt North American White Nationalists can be critical of the FN’s [National Front's] positioning [i.e., their public stance that they are unconcerned whether the ethnic French become a minority in France]. I would note however that, as of today, this position is necessary for the FN to be a media-acceptable and potentially electable political party (in contrast for example with the British National Party, which nonetheless does important counter-cultural and metapolitical work). If Marine Le Pen becomes President of the Republic, as a recent poll suggests she could if she faces François Hollande in the second round in 2017, then no doubt freedom of speech on this topic would be much greater in France. For example, already Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in Hungary has been able to argue with other European leaders that “[t]he goal is to cease immigration whatsoever” and that “the ethnic basis of the Nation-State” should not be broken.
Another case where moderating the message can result in important influence on issues such as immigration policy is illustrated in the contrast between Norway and Sweden ...
Posts
