"... 1. Introduction: The Premise
Demographically, it is no longer possible to win politically. ...
"7. Conclusion
"The idea of a European homeland may sound far-fetched, but then again, so did the idea of a Jewish homeland sound far-fetched when Herzl wrote his book. In fact, one of the wealthiest potential backers from who Herzl sought help, the Rothschilds, dismissed him out of hand.
"Rather than focusing on the naysayers, thoughtful activists will consider what the alternatives are.
"And realistic activists will have to agree: essentially there are no alternatives to geographic consolidation. The historical record is clear: those people who do not possess a territory in which they form the majority population, are doomed to extinction.
"The challenge is open. Will we have what it takes to survive, or will we perish?"
It is good that people are thinking in practical terms. As far as any new white national homeland, you would need at least two, one in North America and one in Europe. You would never want to have just one in isolation that could be so temptingly wiped off the face of the earth. Plus each would be the ally of the other. (I think. Our record on this is not unblemished.)
But whites are already separating themselves out. One of the sane things that even liberal Democrats agree upon is that they do not want to live in nonwhite neighborhoods. Hence white flight. So eventually you will have large concentrations of whites in the South, the Midwest and so on. Some will have lived in these regions for generations. Remember, even whites can have strong emotional attachments to their family land. We are human.But then it will come to pass that these many millions of whites will decide to pack up and move to, say, Eastern Europe to start a new homeland, but, before leaving, making sure to tie a big pretty ribbon around their former homelands as part of their thoughtful parting gift to the invaders? Don't think so.
Posts
